Actor-Network Theory

ANT

Actor-Network Theory: A framework for studying the ways in which networks are sustained by human practices, objects, technologies, and representations (…) ANT emerges from attempts to interpret the frequently overlooked work that needs to be carried out to ‘‘knit together’’ human actors and non-human actors, the technical and the non-technical, with the aim to reveal ways in which networks and relations are assembled and maintained, and thus made ‘‘social’’ (or not) (…) It maps relations that are simultaneously material (between things) and semiotic (between concepts) (…) relations need to be constantly “performed”, otherwise the network will resolve (…) Actor-Network Theory does not typically attempt to explain why a network exists; it is more interested in the infrastructure of actor-networks, how they are formed, how they can fall apart, etc.

 

References

Paul Jones & Kenton Card (2011) Constructing “Social Architecture”: The Politics of Representing Practice, Architectural Theory Review, 16:3, 228-244, DOI: 10.1080/13264826.2011.621543

Wikipedia: The Actor-Network Theory

Learning Theories: ANT available here

Image available here

One thought on “Actor-Network Theory

  1. Pingback: Bruno Latour | connecting data to information to knowledge

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s